浙江社会科学

数智时代，历史虚无主义思潮以技术为手段，通过技术“隐形”，布下“舆论陷阱”“认知陷阱”“行为陷阱”“价值陷阱”，形成技术遮蔽型历史虚无主义。技术遮蔽型历史虚无主义利用技术场域空间，借技术外衣“加工”舆论话题、虚构舆论场景，以柔性化话语潜隐式颠覆历史认知、碎片化手法离散式解构历史叙事、吸睛化议题聚合式发酵历史舆论、娱乐化镜像沉浸式戏谑历史真相，其不易察觉的风险样态进一步加剧识别与防范难度。需要从技术本源属性、内容深度伪造、用户圈层管理、媒介景观娱乐等层面，深度剖析技术遮蔽型历史虚无主义的行为逻辑，准确把握技术放大历史虚无主义风险的内在理路，构建“价值—技术—制度”三位一体系统治理架构，以技术赋能价值谱系、技术驱动风险智治、技术支撑制度规则，构筑历史虚无主义的技术治理新格局。

In the digital—intelligent era,the trend of historical nihilism has undergone a transformation by leveraging technology as a veil. Through technical “invisibility,” it sets “public opinion traps”“cognitive traps”“behavioral traps” and “value traps”,thereby forming what is termed technology—obfuscated historical nihilism. This variant treats the technological domain as its sphere of existence,employing technical means to “manufacture” public discourse and fabricate discursive scenarios.It subtly subverts historical cognition through softened rhetoric,deconstructs historical narratives via fragmented approaches,amplifies historical debates with sensationalized topics,and trivializes historical truth through entertaining,immersive representations. These elusive risk manifestations further complicate its identification and prevention. This study delves into the behavioral logic of technology—obfuscated historical nihilism by analyzing the inherent attributes of technology,deepfake content,user community management,and media spectacle entertainment,thereby clarifying how technology amplifies the risks of historical nihilism. Furthermore,it proposes a tripartite governance framework integrating “values,technology,and institutions”,advocating for technological decoding of value systems,technology—driven risk governance,and technology—empowered institutional rules to forge a new paradigm for the technological governance of historical nihilism.