nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 05, No.285 4-14+156
环境信息规制与企业绩效——来自重点排污单位的准自然实验
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.14167/j.zjss.2020.05.001
发布时间: 2020-05-15
出版时间: 2020-05-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

本文采用双重差分法探讨中国环境信息规制政策对企业绩效的影响,研究发现环境信息规制能有效提高企业绩效。具体来说,在全样本下环境信息规制会倒逼企业增加创新投入,改善生产技术水平;同时也提高了企业信息透明度,降低企业与投资者之间的信息不对称,进而提高企业绩效。但是,基于不同产权性质下环境信息规制影响企业绩效的异质性分析发现,相较于国有企业,其促进作用在非国有企业中表现更强。这一结果产生的原因可能是国有企业面临着较为严厉的监管约束,更注重加强环保设施投入,自身环境表现良好,且信息不对称对其约束作用较弱。通过变更指标衡量方式、安慰剂检验和样本量敏感性等稳健性检验,以上结论依然成立。在中国环境治理的实践中,较完善的环境信息披露规制制度对企业发展和环境改善有着积极作用。

Abstract:

This paper discusses the influence of environmental information regulation on enterprise performance by using the difference-in-differences method, and finds that environmental information regulation can effectively improve enterprise performance. In detail, environmental information regulation will force enterprises to increase investment in innovation and improve the level of production technology. At the same time, it also improves enterprise information transparency, reduces information asymmetry between enterprises and investors, and thus improves enterprise performance. However, based on the heterogeneity analysis of the influence of environmental information regulation on enterprise performance under different property rights, it is found that, compared with state-owned enterprises, its promoting effect is stronger in non-stateowned enterprises. The reason for this result may be that state-owned enterprises are faced with severe regulatory constraints, pay more attention to strengthening investment in environmental protection facilities, perform well in their own environment, and the information asymmetry has a weak constraint effect on them, so the reverse mechanism and information increment effect of environmental information regulation on state-owned enterprises are not obvious. The above conclusions were still valid through the robustness tests. In the practice of China's environmental governance, a more perfect regulatory system of environmental information disclosure plays a positive role in the development of enterprises and environmental improvement.

参考文献

1.曹霞、张路蓬:《企业绿色技术创新扩散的演化博弈分析》,《中国人口·资源与环境》2015年第7期。

2.常莹莹、曾泉:《环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》2019年第05期。

3.范庆泉:《环境规制、收入分配失衡与政府补偿机制》,《经济研究》2018年第5期。

4.何玉、唐清亮、王开田:《碳绩效与财务绩效》,《会计研究》2017年第2期。

5.康志勇、张宁、汤学良等:《“减碳”政策制约了中国企业出口吗》,《中国工业经济》2018年第09期。

6.李维安、张耀伟、郑敏娜等:《中国上市公司绿色治理及其评价研究》,《管理世界》2019年第05期。

7.刘和旺、郑世林、王宇锋:《所有制类型、技术创新与企业绩效》,《中国软科学》2015年第03期。

8.吕峻、焦淑艳:《环境披露、环境绩效和财务绩效关系的实证研究》,《山西财经大学学报》2011年第01期。

9.任胜钢、郑晶晶、刘东华等:《排污权交易机制是否提高了企业全要素生产率——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《中国工业经济》2019年第05期。

10.沈洪涛、游家兴、刘江宏:《再融资环保核查、环境信息披露与权益资本成本》,《金融研究》2010年第12期。

11.田利辉、王可第:《社会责任信息披露的“掩饰效应”和上市公司崩盘风险——来自中国股票市场的DIDPSM分析》,《管理世界》2017年第11期。

12.王云、李延喜、马壮等:《媒体关注、环境规制与企业环保投资》,《南开管理评论》2017年第6期。

13.温素彬、周鎏鎏:《企业碳信息披露对财务绩效的影响机理——媒体治理的“倒U型”调节作用》,《管理评论》2017年第11期。

14.吴红军:《环境信息披露、环境绩效与权益资本成本》,《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第03期。

15.吴红军、刘啟仁、吴世农:《公司环保信息披露与融资约束》,《世界经济》2017年第5期。

16.张华、丰超、时如义:《绿色发展:政府与公众力量》,《山西财经大学学报》2017年第11期。

17. Al-Tuwaijri S A,Christensen T E.Hughes K I.The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure,Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance:A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting Organisations&Society, 2004,29 (5-6),447~71.

18. Dhaliwal D S,Li O Z,Tsang A, et al.Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital:The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Accounting Review,2011,86(1),59~100.

19. Du X,Weng J,Zeng Q, et al.Do Lenders Applaud Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Chinese Private-Owned Firms. J Bus Ethics,2017,143(1),179~207.

20. Durnev A,Morck R,Yeung B, et al.Does Greater Firm-Specific Return Variation Mean More or Less Informed Stock Pricing?. Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41(5),797~836.

21. Ferreira M A.Laux P A.Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow. Journal of Finance,2007,62(2),951~89.

22. Finster M P.Hernke M T.Benefits Organizations Pursue when Seeking Competitive Advantage by Improving Environmental Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2015,18(5),652~62.

23. Funder D C.Colvin C R.Explorations in behavioral consistency:properties of persons, situations, and behaviors.J Pers Soc Psychol,1991,60(5),773~94.

24. Kim Y,Park M S.Wier B.Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility?. The Accounting Review,2012,87(3),761~96.

25. Latridis G E.Environmental disclosure quality:Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review,2013,14(1),55~75.

26. Morck R,Yeung B.Yu W.The information content of stock markets:why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?. Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58(1-2),215~60.

27. Moulton L.Divining Value with Relational Proxies:How Moneylenders Balance Risk and Trust in the Quest for Good Borrowers1. Sociological Forum,2007,22(3),300~30.

28. Plumlee M,Brown D,Hayes R M, et al.Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value:Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2015,34(4),336~61.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14167/j.zjss.2020.05.001

中图分类号:X322;F275;F832.51

引用信息:

[1]许东彦,佟孟华,林婷.环境信息规制与企业绩效——来自重点排污单位的准自然实验[J].浙江社会科学,2020,No.285(05):4-14+156.DOI:10.14167/j.zjss.2020.05.001.

发布时间:

2020-05-15

出版时间:

2020-05-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文