| 615 | 7 | 32 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
芬伯格在新的时代条件下对马克思人类解放思想进行现实追问,延续了马克思人类解放逻辑的未尽之意,适时提出技术民主化方案,以技术解放思想有益补充了马克思的人类解放体系。芬伯格的技术解放思想具有进步意义,通过改造技术促进民主的完善,在技术系统内部寻求解放的张力。然而,他将人类解放的实现局限于技术解放,并寄希望于"责任文化"与技术精英的"良心发现",不可避免地陷入"道德政治学"和"技术万能论"的理论危机,始终未能突破马克思的整体性研究框架。要实现人类解放,必须回归马克思。
Abstract：Feenberg questioned Marx's thought of human emancipation in the new era, continued the unexplained intention of Marx's logic of emancipation, and timely put forward a technical democratization plan to scientifically supplement Marx's human emancipation system. Feenberg's thought of technological liberation is of progressive significance. It promotes the perfection of democracy through the transformation of technology and seeks the tension of liberation within the technological system. However, he limited the realization of human emancipation to technological liberation and hoped for the responsibility and the conscience of technological elites. He inevitably fell into the theoretical crisis of "moral politics" and "omnipotence of technology", and failed to break through the overall research framework of Marx. To realize human emancipation, we must return to Marx.
(1)(5)(11)(12)(14)(17)(20)(25)Feenberg,A.,Transforming Technology:A Critical Theory Revisited,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p3、76、18、19、20、183、84、8.
(2)张一兵、蒙木桂：《神会马克思》，中国人民大学出版社2004年版，第129页。
(3)Bunge,M.，“Technoholodemocracy:an alternative to capitalism and socialism”,Mahner,M.,Scientific Realism:Selected Essays of Mario Bunge,Prometheus Books,2001:p.406~412.
(4)(13)Feenberg,A.，“Encountering Technology”,Technology,Modernity,and Democracy,Eduardo Beira and Andrew Feenberg,Rowman&Littlefield International Ltd,2018,p.21、13.
(6)(9)(10)(18) Feenberg,A.,Alternative Modernity:The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory,Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,1995,p.103、37、37、37.
(7)Winner,L.,Do Artifacts Have Politics?Modern Technology:Problem or Opportunity,Vol.109,No.1,1980,pp.121~136.
(8)Marx K and Engels F.Collected Works Volume 5[M].London:Lawrence and Wishart,2010,p.5.
(15)Philip Brey,Philosophy of Technology:A Time for Maturation,Metascience,1997(6),p.97.
(16)Winner,L.,Democracy in a Technological Society,Dordrecht:Springer,1992,pp.15~51.
(19)Reinhold Niebuhr,Moral Man and Immoral Society:AStudy in Ethics and Politics,Westminster John Knox Press,2002,pp.89~101.
(21)(23)Doppelt,G.,What sort of ethics does technology require?The Journal of Ethics,2001(5),pp.160~161、155~175.
(22) Veak,T.,Whose Technology?Whose Modernity?Questioning Feenberg’s Questioning Technology,Science,Technology and Human Values,2000,25(2),p.236.
(24)Feenberg,A.,Democratizing Technology:Interests,Codes,Rights,The Journal of Ethics,2001,5(2),pp.177~195.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14167/j.zjss.2021.01.012
中图分类号:A81
引用信息:
[1]王晓梅,何丽.芬伯格的技术解放设想为何落空？[J].浙江社会科学,2021,No.293(01):111-115+101+159.DOI:10.14167/j.zjss.2021.01.012.
基金信息:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“之江青年课题”（19ZJQN06YB）; 浙江大学马克思主义学院研究生科研支持项目（MYJS2018-7）; 浙江省高校思想政治理论课（钭利珍）名师工作室支持项目
2021-01-15
2021-01-15